YOU NEED TO BE A PSYCHOLOGIST TO EVEN BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND THIS!

YOU NEED TO BE A PSYCHOLOGIST TO EVEN BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND THIS!

I am genuinely perplexed that the liberals have become maskhole vaxers.  Weren’t the liberals that now run the country born of the sixties, a time when they (correctly) questioned and distrusted the “man?”  Weren’t they the ones that correctly heeded President Eisenhower’s warning to be wary of the military industrial complex?  Weren’t they the ones who were Berkley champions of the First Amendment?  Of course they were, but as Bob Dylan sang, “the times, they are a-changin’.”  And they have changed. 

Now, the liberals are beholden to big corporations, big government and the suppression of freedom and liberty.   And in an amazing twist of perspective, they are into big pharma too. We are all too well aware of the liberal maskholes wearing their masks, insisting on vaccination for the common good, oozing superiority and self-righteous contempt for anyone who disagrees.  Man, you can cut it with a knife when they are around.  If you’re without a mask, you are a callous inconsiderate ignorant killer of the elderly, the children and the vaccinated maskers, which is splendidly ironic given that the maskholes’ holiest of sacraments is abortion, which, last time I checked, kills quite a few more children than people without masks.  For your information, according to the CDC, there were 619,820 abortions in 2020.  In comparison, (this is from the Intelligencer) over the course of the pandemic, 49,000 Americans under the age of 18 have died of all causes, according to the CDC. Only 331 of those deaths have been from COVID — less than half as many as have died of pneumonia. In 2019, more than 2,000 American kids and teenagers died in car crashes.  According to some estimates, about a thousand die from drowning.  So, maskholes, get your priorities straight and start trying to outlaw swimming and motor-vehicles, they kill more kids than covid, a lot more.  The flu kills more kids than Covid, too, but Covid cured that.  I haven’t spoken to a soul who’s had the flu since Covid arrived.

But, to my point of analysis.  Merck & Co is now claiming they have an experimental antiviral pill, molnupiravir, that can halve the chances of dying or being hospitalized for those most at risk of contracting severe COVID-19.  Experts, a title that has been rendered meaningless of late, hail it as a potential breakthrough in how the virus is treated.  If it gets authorization, molnupiravir, which is designed to introduce errors into the genetic code of the virus, would be the first oral antiviral medication for COVID-19. Except it isn’t the first antiviral medication for Covid-19. 

A Yale University professor and renowned cancer researcher has pored over the COVID-19 literature and treated several dozen patients. Dr. Alessandro Santin, a practicing oncologist and scientist who runs a large laboratory at Yale, believes firmly that ivermectin vastly cuts suffering from COVID-19. Santin joins a large and growing group of doctors committed to using the safe, generic drug both as an early home treatment to prevent hospitalization and alongside inpatient treatments like steroids and oxygen.  The bottom line is that ivermectin works.

Except it doesn’t work for big pharmas’ bottom line.  The estimated cost of ivermectin is $0.55.  The estimated cost of molnupiravir is $255.57.  That’s 464.67 times more expensive – and big pharma, Joe Biden, Congress and all government agencies condemns ivermectin and laud molnupiravir.  Of course, they do.  They are in business to make money.  No fault with that, except for the politicians and bureaucrats.  I do find some fault with their love-affair with big pharma. They are supposed to be working for the people.  But, and again, it’s about the money.  Big pharma, just this year contributed an average of $8501.00 to each house democrat, $6,848 to each house republican, $17,867.00 to each democrat senator and $6,678.00 to each republican senator.  Throw in the independents and the total contributed to individual representatives and senators is over three million bucks.  Okay, congress is bought and paid for, but, the liberals, the non-bureaucrats, non-politicians, the liberal voters, genuflecting to big pharma, screaming for everybody to get vaccinated, all in the name of the common good – well, that’s a perplexing one. 

By the way, the data I have in here is not easy to come by.  Google, a leftist reincarnation of Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, made me search to page six or seven to find a single article supporting ivermectin or anything that didn’t condemn it.  I had to sift through endless posts on the divine Molnurpriavir and the evil ivermectin before I found anything,  foot noted, referenced, and validated, that supported my contention.   

Anyway, Molnurpriavir is it, right?  The politicians and big pharma say so, but check this out.  Merck’s Molnupiravir only surfaced after a prominent scandal involving Merck lying three times, like Peter disowned Christ three times.  Merck lied, stating:

1. There is no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect from ivermectin against COVID-19 from preclinical studies.  This is false. 
2.  There is no meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy from ivermectin in patients with COVID-19 disease.  This is false.
3. There was a lack of safety data in the majority of studies regarding ivermectin.  This is false.

Here’s some more information for you to digest. The Monash preclinical study disproved the first statement showing a massive 99.98% reduction in viral load with a single Ivermectin treatment in cell culture.  The second statement is disproved by the FLCCC’s Public Statement issued January 18, 2021, that reports colossal evidence for Ivermectin’s clinical activity and efficacy against COVID-19 in clinical settings, including a large reduction in mortality rates, shorter durations of hospital stays, profound reductions in the infectivity rate in both pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis studies, faster times to clinical recovery and faster times to viral clearance.  Finally, the third statement concerning “lack of safety data” contradicts the published WHO safety data. In 3.7 billion doses of Ivermectin given over four decades, Ivermectin has proven exceedingly safe. 

If you liberals don’t think you’re useful idiots, here’s some more information.  Merck is in the position to know Ivermectin’s true safety profile as they provided those billions of doses for the Mectizan Donation program.

Does any of this matter?  It does not appear so.  On June 9, 2021, the US government agreed to pay $1.2 billion for 1.7 million doses of the new antiviral, Molnupiravir, before clinical testing showed either effectiveness or safety – while ivermectin was just sitting there, begging to be used.

And Merk & Co. is no different than Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson, money driven, more than willing to twist the truth (or obliterate it) in the name of profit and greed.  Then again, in a roomful of idiots (useful ones according to Carl Marx) intent on self-destruction (the current left), or, another metaphor, if the Titanic is going down, why not take some silverware , who can blame them?  I mean big pharma and big government’s deceit is right there for the seeing, only fifty clicks or so on Google, Yahoo or Safari.  To bad most people don’t have the energy.  I mean, it is quite the workout to click through a search engine, especially when the pain isn’t physical, it’s psychological, like when you realize you are a complete moron.  Nobody wants that, right?

Although, isn’t it more painful to be a never-ending moron rather than one who realizes it and changes his or her status?  Maybe not.  Maybe ignorance is bliss?  It certainly seems that way of late.  Notwithstanding the temptation, I think I’ll take a pass on blissful ignorance.  It’s not who I am.    

So, let me conclude.  Maskhole Vaxer liberals who claim to hate big business, corporatocracy, lobbying, and oppressive government are, through their words, actions and conduct, on their knees, genuflecting to all that they supposedly hate.  How is it that a mass of people who vilify big business, are for the little guy, and part of a movement born in the sixties, so adoring of their claimed arch enemy? Okay, I give.  I’m not sure even a psychiatrist can figure this one out.

And that’s my Reetzality for the day.

Brett Reetz